The History of Phonics – The Oldest Argument in the World
Did you know that one of the most politicized debates going on right now
across the country isn’t security, the war on terror, or even the abortion
debate?
This debate has caused the death of many political careers while at the same
time launched others into the stratosphere. As you read this, there are people
in just about every corner of the country taking up arms for the side they
believe in.
So just what is it that has everyone so angry and polarized? What could be so
important that millions of people are ready and willing to tirelessly fight for
their side? It’s children’s literacy. Surprised?
Children’s literacy, and more importantly the Phonics Vs. Whole
Word debate, is one of the most politically charged campaign platforms a
politician can use. In their quest for votes, more than a few politicians have
become casualties in what has been dubbed the “Reading Wars”.
Even as surprising as this revelation in, it may surprise you even more to
learn that the phonics
reading comprehension debate started almost 500 years ago, and it started with
the Catholic Church and an angry priest named Martin Luther.
The Phonics Reformation
When Martin Luther decided he’d had enough of the pope and the Catholic
Church in the 16th century, he figured it was time for a change. His
disagreements were part metaphysical, but he also had problems with the way the
church conducted itself.
Part of Luther’s anger stemmed from the fact the Church conducted all of
its services in Latin. The Catholic Church believed that Latin was a pure
language, and the only one fit for worshipping God.
This left the everyday common folk out of the loop, so to speak. The largely
illiterate masses of Eastern Europe could hardly be expected to read and write
Latin if they could barely master their native tongues. This was simply another
sign to Luther that the Catholic Church had lost touch with the common man.
In anger, he caused a split in the Catholic Church at its fundamental
level—a branch in another direction. Both sides were angry, and both sides
accused the other of Heresy. Nevertheless, the deed had been done, and the
Catholic Church had its first competitor for the souls of good Christians
everywhere.
Martin Luther’s protest would have been impossible were it not for the
advent of the printing press. He used propaganda to great effect, printing
slanderous pictures of the pope and the Catholic Church and putting them
anywhere people might see them. A loyal following quickly formed around him, and
he was all set for his new church.
One of the first things Luther and his followers did was to go about
transcribing the Bible and several other holy texts from Latin to English. He
began to teach all of his sermons in English, and taught the people the proper
Latin prayers in English, so they could be understood.
There was still the problem with illiteracy, however, and Luther saw that his
work was useless unless he could somehow be teaching reading of the newly
translated books. Always up for a challenge, he and his men set about developing
an easy, singular way of learning to read the English Language. In other words,
Luther and his followers invented Phonics.
200 Years of Boring Drills
For the next 200 years or so, the phonics
system of learning remained basically unchanged. There were many attempts to
improve it, but the core ideas remained essentially the same—constant
repetition of alphabetic code training, syllable memorization, and finally
decoding words by “sounding them out”.
The first step was memorization of the Alphabetic Code. Every letter is
assigned a sound, and some (such as “c” or vowel letters) have soft and hard
versions. Children were taught to memorize these sounds, or phonemes through
drilling. Often, these drills were said aloud, in a chorus, or as kids games as
the children went through all of the letters.
Next, they were taught the 44
distinct sounds of the English language. Of course, some of these overlap
with the single letter sounds of the alphabetic code training. Generally, these
were single syllable nonsense sounds that could be strung together to form small
three and four letter words.
When the children had progressed to the point where they could identify
single words, they were given the task of simple sentences. Naturally, this
progressed to the point where they were reading regular text from books and
playing card & family board games.
In every case, the importance of phonic training is the memorization of
sounds and words. This can make for an interesting situation where a child can
read a word properly yet has no idea what the word means.
Nonetheless, the point of phonics is reading, not comprehension. Educators of
the time felt that comprehension would come with time, as long as the student
kept working on their phonic training. In other words, read enough, and
eventually it will all make sense.
19th Century Changes
In the 19th Century several developments occurred in the way phonics were
taught that changed the system forever. Additionally, several new forms of
literacy training arrived on the scene.
McGuffey’s Eclectic Reader for Young Children produced phonics-work
for schools and parents from the 1830’s to the 1920s. What made these books
important was that they contained a modified “phonic” alphabet that included
all of the digraphs.
Digraphs are the two-letter combinations in the English language such as
“ch”, “th”, and “sh”. The digraphs were specially marked for easier
recognition. This form of phonic
instruction immediately became popular, and its use has continued to this
day.
In the 1840s the Oswego method of learning was developed. The Oswego method
did away with boring, repetitive phonics drills altogether and instead focused
on stories for phonetic learning.
Later, in the 1880s, a man named F.W. Parker devised a system where children
did away with phonics learning altogether. Parker’s belief was that “reading
is thinking”, and developed a system where children learned how to read and
write by writing their own books.
According to experts, he claimed at one point to have a personal library of
over 10,000 books all written by children. It was his belief that the more
children were exposed to the relationships of words in regards to one another,
the more they would understand about how the English language worked.
Some people believe that this formula would prove to be the grandfather of
Whole Word Learning, the arch-enemy of the phonic system of learning.
Can You Spell Pinko?
The development of whole
word learning began to split the education sector as early as the 1920s. On
one side were traditionalists, who favoured the phonic method of code-emphasis,
and on the other side were more holistic-minded whole word supporters, who
favoured the meaning-emphasis method.
As time progressed, this separation became more pronounced. Study after study
was done for both sides, each having the desired effect of polarizing the two
groups even more. The, during the 1950s, a series of articles were written that
turned the learning debate into a political one, and the Great Reading Wars
officially began.
Rudolf Flesch’s novel, “Why Johnny Can’t Read”, was published in 1955
and became one of first strikes of the now right-wing phonics stable against the
whole word supporters on the left wing. The novel oversimplified the argument,
hinted at left-wing conspiracies within the education system, and eluded to
communist plots that would “dumb-down” the children of America.
Obviously, supporters of whole word learning were outraged. They struck back
by likening phonics drills to military brainwashing, something that would drive
all sense of individuality out of children and create mindless automatons
dedicated to the government.
With both sides now howling and eager for blood, it was a perfect place for
election-minded politicians to catch root. The reading war became a political
platform, with politicians on both sides rallying to the cause of their
constituents.
Today, this war continues. There seems little hope for either side to give up
their fight. In almost every school board in North America this debate
continues. In some places, code-emphasis is preferred as the “proper” way
for literacy and reading fluency training, while in others it’s the
meaning-emphasis method. The result has been a mosaic of education systems
across the country where a curriculum can vary greatly from one county to the
next.
Hope for the Future
It is into this political minefield that a new concept has recently wandered.
Known as a Balanced Approach to reading and writing, it is actually a
combination of word-memorization and phonics training mixed into a single
learning style. This type of education uses a strong background of phonics
training but does away with many of the old phonics laws in favour of the
holistic reading and meaning-emphasis of whole word learning.
This method is slowly winning support from both sides, although critics claim
it is merely an effort to stop the reading debates and its results are mostly
unfounded.
Of course, there are many studies coming out now that say the balanced
approach is the best way to go. Only time will tell if these studies are right.
Looking back to the beginning of the Phonics method, it is hard to believe
that Martin Luther and his followers could possible have believed that their
method of teaching prayers and the Bible to illiterate farmers would be at the
root of one of the most highly debated topics in education today.
Of course, one could also go back to one of the great minds of the
Enlightenment Era, Jean-Jacques Rousseau. On a much deeper level, this argument
is really about what is better for mankind: discipline or freedom.
The Discipline vs. Freedom argument is as old and basic as time itself. There
will always be people on both sides of that fence.
Unfortunately, the Phonics vs. Whole Word debate seems to be destined for
that same fate.
About The Author
Bill Schnarr is a successful freelance writer providing tips and advice for
consumers purchasing the Hooked on Phonics reading program, home school lesson
plans and children's story books by Dr. Seuss. His numerous articles offer
moneysaving tips and valuable insight on typically confusing topics.
This article on the "History
of Phonics" reprinted with permission.
How can the history of phonics help us teach phonics today!
|